Discussion
Diagnosis With Brief Discussion
- Diagnosis
- Mediastinal hemangioma
- Radiologic Findings
- Fig 1. Chest PA shows a subtle nodular opacity in the left apex.
Fig 2-5. Mediastinal window setting of the chest CT scan shows a 19mm sized nodular lesion in the left apical paravertebral area, which closely abuts the costovertebral junction of left 2nd rib. The nodule shows heterogeneous attenuation without calcification on precontrast scan. After contrast administration, the nodule shows marked and heterogeneous enhancement (average 194 HU).
Fig 6. FDG-PET/CT scan shows no definite hypermetabolism in the nodule.
- Brief Review
- Hemangioma is a rare, benign vascular tumor that counts for less than 0.5% of all mediastinal masses. The cause of hemangioma is unclear. It has been speculated that they represent either true neoplasm or developmental vascular anomalies. At histologic examination, these tumors consist of large interconnecting vascular spaces lined by flattened cuboidal epithelium along with a varying amount of interspersed stromal elements, such as fat, myxoid, and fibrinous tissues. They are categorized as capillary, cavernous, or venous hemangiomas on the basis of the size of the vascular spaces. Most mediastinal hemangiomas are found in the anterior mediastinum; however, a few arise in the posterior mediastinum.
The preoperative diagnosis may be difficult because the tumors usually manifest as nonspecific mediastinal masses on image finding. Phleboliths, a potentially diagnostic finding, are seen in only 10% of conventional radiographs. Calcification is more readily identifiable on CT scans. Punctate calcification is seen more commonly and needs to be differentiated from the calcification seen in patients with teratoma or cartilaginous tumor. However, our case also did not contain any calcifications suggesting phleboliths.
Hemangiomas commonly appear as heterogeneous lesions on unenhanced CT scans. Their appearance depends on the stromal content and degree of thrombosed vascular channels. Contrast enhancement is most often heterogeneous and central. Gradually increasing and persistent enhancement has been seen on dynamic contrast-enhanced CT scans. Large draining veins have also been seen on delayed images. In our case, the hemangioma showed heterogeneous and avid enhancement but gradually increasing or persistent enhancement could not be confirmed because dynamic contrast scans were not taken.In mediastinal hemangiomas, FDG uptake is known to be as low and similar to hemangiomas of extremities. FDG-PET may provide information to differentiate hemangiomas from malignant neoplasms except for small or dominantly necrotizing lesions that PET cannot provide accurate data due to limitation inspatial resolution.
- References
- 1. Prachi P., Hean M., Frederic R. Case130: Mediastinal Hemangioma. Radiology 2008; 246:634-637
2. H. Page, Melissa L., Cesar A. Mediastinal Hemangioma: Radiographic and CT Features in 14 Patients. Radiology 1994; 193:399-402
3. Sakurai K., Hara M., Ozawa Y et al., Thoracic hemangiomas: imaging via CT, MR, and PET along with pathologic correlation. J Thorac Imaging 2008;23(2):114-120
- Keywords
- Mediastinum, Posterior mediastinum,